Driftwood
FeaturedA local-first sync engine you can drop into an app you already shipped
Both improve confidence before something breaks, but they watch different layers. Overcast watches running services; Shipyard catches bad data changes before they merge. Teams that ship data products usually end up wanting both, so the useful question is which one to buy first.
Observability a two-person team can afford to run and actually understand
Deploy previews for data pipelines, so reviewers see the diff in the data
| Attribute | Overcast | Shipyard |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source | Paid |
| Entry price | Free tier available | $49/mo |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Category | Developer Tools, Open Source | Developer Tools |
| Upvotes | 1.1k | 731 |
| Discussion | 142 comments | 44 comments |
| Launched | 2026 | 2026 |
| Verified | Yes | Yes |
Overcast answers is it up and how fast is it. Shipyard answers did this change break the numbers.
These sound adjacent and are operationally very different. A service can be perfectly healthy while emitting wrong data for a month, and no amount of latency monitoring will surface it.
Both post to pull requests, both integrate with the same warehouses, and both are priced per unit of work rather than per seat. If you are running them together, Shipyard's diffs can trigger Overcast alerts on merge — the integration is a webhook, not a project.
Overcast is priced on ingested volume, which scales with traffic. Shipyard is priced per repository plus your own warehouse compute, which scales with how often you open pull requests. For most teams Shipyard is the smaller and more predictable line.
Buy Overcast first if your pages come from services timing out. Buy Shipyard first if your incidents are "the dashboard has been wrong since Tuesday". If you cannot tell which, it is almost always the second one — silent data failures are the ones that go undetected longest.
Buy Overcast first if your pages come from services timing out. Buy Shipyard first if your incidents are "the dashboard has been wrong since Tuesday". If you cannot tell which, it is almost always the second one — silent data failures are the ones that go undetected longest.
Overcast has the lower entry price at Free versus $49 for Shipyard. Entry price is rarely the whole story though — check how each one scales, since seat-based and usage-based pricing diverge sharply as a team grows.
Overcast is open source and can be self-hosted. Shipyard is a hosted product with no self-hosted option.
Both improve confidence before something breaks, but they watch different layers. Overcast watches running services; Shipyard catches bad data changes before they merge. Teams that ship data products usually end up wanting both, so the useful question is which one to buy first.
If neither is quite right, these pages cover the wider field.
A local-first sync engine you can drop into an app you already shipped
Deploy previews for data pipelines, so reviewers see the diff in the data
Revenue analytics that tells you what changed instead of showing forty charts